The Canadian government has taken a bold step and requested the cessation of TikTok's business practices within the country owing to issues related to national security. However, citizens of Canada will be granted the right to download and use the application similarly like before.

Background and Decision

The decision comes after a thorough review of TikTok's plan to invest and expand its business in Canada. According to Francois-Philippe Champagne, the Minister for Innovation, the decision was made in an effort to deal with particular risks arising from ByteDane ltd which is Tiktok's mother company in China and its operations. The review involved rigorous scrutiny by Canada's national security and intelligence community.

Impact on TikTok's Operations

As a result of the order, TikTok will be required to close its offices in Toronto and Vancouver. Despite the shutdown of its business operations, the Canadian government has made it clear that it is not blocking Canadians from accessing the app or using it to create content. The government emphasized that the decision to use a social media application or platform is a personal choice and encouraged Canadians to adopt good cybersecurity practices.

Response from TikTok

TikTok has expressed its intention to challenge the order in court. A spokesperson for the company stated that shutting down TikTok's Canadian offices and destroying hundreds of well-paying local jobs is not in anyone's best interest. The representative also explained that the shutting of TikTok offices in Canada will be detrimental to the company and its staff.

Broader Context

This support comes at a time where there is a recurring series of close scrutiny and questioning over business entities from China that are located in America. Concerns about the privacy issues with the TikTok app have been raised in the United States as well as issues of the growing threat of the Chinese authorities. The U.S, Government has just responded by blocking people in government from downloading and using the app.

That time I was on TikTok, I came across a certain video claiming there is a chase bank glitch through which one could become rich. The serenity was unbearable, and I just had to listen to the guy explain how someone can easily exploit this throttle in order to become wealthy. However, on the comments section many users were attesting that it does actually work.

The Reality Behind the Glitch

Curiosity got the better of me, and I decided to dig deeper. Turns out, this "glitch" was nothing more than a scam. People were being tricked into committing bank fraud, thinking they were just taking advantage of a harmless loophole. The reality? Many ended up in serious debt and facing legal consequences.

A Personal Story: Alex's Experience

One story that really hit home was about a college student named Alex. Alex was struggling to make ends meet and saw the TikTok video as a lifeline. Desperate, he followed the steps, thinking he could finally pay off his student loans. Instead, he found himself in a financial nightmare. The bank flagged his account for suspicious activity, and he was soon contacted by law enforcement.

Red Flags to Watch Out For

Alex’s story serves as a sobering reminder: if something appears to be too good, take heart and know that it most likely is not. Here are some signs of on the internet scams to be on the lookout for:

1. Caution Against Promises of Easy Money: Keep away from any initiative which claims to offer quick and effortless cash with minimal effort involved.
2. Inducement for Rapid Action: Fraudsters create an atmosphere of haste that discourages critical thinking.
3. Requests for Personal Details: A reliable business organization will never ask for sensitive information such as bank account or social security numbers through emails or social networking sites.
4. Unsourced Information: Always confirm source reliability. If it is some unverified TikTok profile, think twice before believing it.
5. Excessive success stories: Should others claim they made it instantly in comments sections, you might want to suspect those are scams meant to lure more victims.

A $1.4 Billion Victory for Texans' Privacy Rights

So, Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton just totally owned Facebook’s parent company, Meta. He won a huge lawsuit against them for a billion and a half bucks! The whole thing was about this creepy feature on Facebook where they’d secretly scan people’s faces without telling them. Yeah, not cool.

The Unseen Invasion

Back in 2011, when Meta was still known as Facebook, the company rolled out its "tag" feature. This seemingly innocuous tool allowed software to recognize and sort faces in photos. However, what most Texans didn't realize was that it automatically activated without clear explanations. For over a decade, Meta quietly ran facial recognition software on virtually every uploaded photo, collecting records of people's facial geometry.

Violations and Accountability

Paxton's legal team argued that this violated a 2009 state statute governing biometric data usage and ran afoul of Texas' deceptive trade practices act. The $1.4 billion settlement, the largest ever obtained by a single state against a business, will be paid out over five years. Paxton emphasized that this historic victory demonstrates their commitment to holding tech giants accountable for privacy breaches.

Paxton: A Maverick in the Legal Arena

Ken Paxton, an outspoken conservative, has long criticized large tech companies. His alignment with right-leaning figures like Elon Musk has fueled speculation about his potential role in a second Trump Administration. Despite facing a federal investigation, Paxton's tenacity in pursuing justice remains unwavering.

In the end, this settlement serves as a powerful reminder: even the mightiest corporations must respect Texans' privacy rights. Meta's misstep has cost them dearly, and Paxton's victory reverberates far beyond the courtroom.

Okay, so picture this: Florida just announced some pretty tough laws for kids and their social media adventure. Governor Ron DeSantis got the changes started by signing a bill that has everything to keep our youth safe in the digital world. Let’s take a closer look at what this bill is about.

The Lowdown on HB3

This new rule in the books, House Bill 3 (HB3) is here to address concerns about how social media is messing with young minds. Here's the details:

1. Age restrictions: If you’re under 14, sorry but you cannot have a social media account in Florida. And for 14- and 15-year-old's, it’s best to get your mother's or dad’s approval before you get involved online.

2. Account Cleanup: Social media big shots are now required to destroy accounts of children under 14. Failure to do so could find themselves in some legal hot water.

3. Consequences: Here's the kicker - companies not following these rules might have to cough up some cash. If they don't delete those underage accounts, they could face lawsuits. And the kids? Well, they could get up to $10,000 in damages. Companies could be on the hook for up to $50,000 per violation, plus all those fancy lawyer fees and court costs.

Governor DeSantis Says...

When Governor DeSantis put pen to paper on this bill, he made it clear: parents need a helping hand in this digital parenting game. He knows social media can be a maze, and he's thankful for everyone who pitched in to make HB3 a reality.

The Big Picture

Florida isn't the only one peering into social media's dark corners. Across the country, folks are keeping a close eye on what's happening online, especially when it comes to the young ones. Remember back in December? Over 200 groups were bugging Senate Big Cheese Chuck Schumer about the Kids Online Safety Act (KOSA). This act wants to make sure apps and online spots take responsibility for stuff that could mess with a kid's head.

It's a Balancing Act

But hold on a sec. While protecting kids is super important, some folks are worried these rules might put a damper on free speech and tech progress. Finding that sweet spot between keeping kids safe and letting the digital world do its thing is a tricky business.

One platform that has taken center stage in this narrative is TikTok, the popular short-form video app. TikTok as a News Source When war broke out between Israel and Hamas, TikTok quickly swelled with discussion and content.

TikTok: A Hub for War Discourse

As the conflict unfurled, TikTok witnessed an unprecedented surge in discussions and content related to the Israel-Hamas war. Hashtags like "Palestine" and "Israel" transformed into virtual epicenters, accumulating billions of views. Users worldwide turned to the platform, seeking updates and insights into the conflict.

A Compelling Narrative: Leila Warah's Perspective One individual who notably stood out amidst this digital maelstrom was Leila Warah, a 25-year-old journalist residing in the West Bank. Through her TikTok channel, she presented a unique viewpoint, that of a young Palestinian-American living in a West Bank refugee camp.

The Dominant Influence of Social Media

This surge in TikTok's relevance serves as a stark reminder of the pervasive influence of social media platforms in shaping our comprehension of global events. Studies show that members of Generation Z are more likely to turn to TikTok than Google as a source of news. However, it's important to note that while TikTok can spread both truth and fiction about the conflict, it has played a positive role overall. As Noam Schwartz, co-founder and CEO of ActiveFence Ltd., an Israeli company which builds technology for trust and safety teams in big tech platforms, stated: “People would not believe the magnitude of this event without it being amplified in social media."

TikTok, the social media app owned by Chinese company ByteDance, is facing a UK lawsuit that could see it forced to pay damages of billions of pounds if it is successful. The lawsuit, brought by legal firm Scott and Scott and backed by a former British children's commissioner, claims that the company collects a huge range of children's personal information when they use the app. As well as harvesting their pictures and videos, it is claimed the app also collects children's phone numbers, specific location details and biometric data which it then sells to third parties for profit.

British Children Data Harvested

Parents and children are likely to be shocked by the revelations, as well as privacy regulators, since the app is used by a huge number of teenagers. According to the UKs media regulator OfCom, it is estimated that almost 45% of children aged between 8 and 12 use the app which represents about 3.5 million children in the UK alone and is likely to be potentially millions more across Europe as a whole.

The lawsuit claims that children's personal information was harvested without explicit consent being gained (which, in the case of children under the age of 18, would need to come from an adult) and constitutes a serious breach of both UK and EU privacy provisions, according to one of the lawyers acting for the plaintiffs in the case.

TikTok Blocked

This is not the first time that the ByteDance's data protection policies have been challenged and Tiktok sued. In 2019 the US Federal Trade Commission levied a record fine of $5.7 million against the company for similar offences of illegally gathering children's personal information. It has also come under scrutiny in India where it was temporarily banned and finally blocked completely from the country. TikTok is also under investigation by the UK Information Commissioner's Office for whether it complies with the UK's data protection rules and whether it protects children's right to data privacy with a report expected later in the year.

TikTok claims that it is only intended for users over the age of 13 but it is claimed that the app is being used by much younger children since all they need to do is enter an older age as there is no additional checking performed by the app. Lawyers are seeking thousands of pounds of compensation for each child, seeking that the app meet its user age requirements as well as demanding that the company provide full transparency about the data it collects and the purposes it is used for.

Police in Lake Mary in Florida have taken the unusual step of asking TikTok users to stop stealing campaign signs in response to a challenge issued on the social media site. While sign stealing and removal (on both sides of politics) is not unusual in an election year, this time the police are sheeting the blame for an increase in sign stealing to the social media app TikTok.

An officer with the Florida police has said that over 6.8 million people have viewed TikTok videos online that challenge viewers to remove campaign signs and pointed out that this is in fact a crime. They discovered the trend after interviewing a suspect who told them that there was a challenge encouraging people to steal Trump campaign signs in their local neighborhood. They were also encouraged to steal as many signs as possible and to record a video of the activity according to the suspect.

Apparently at least 24 Trump campaign signs and a Trump flag have been stolen to date in the Lake Mary area and police are appealing to teenagers not to participate in this type of activity since it is a crime to take other people's property and could result in a maximum 6 month jail term for serious offenders. While theft and vandalism laws vary between states, most states treat stealing political signs as a misdemeanor which will only result in a fine rather than jail time. Similar to a speeding ticket, such fines are likely to range from $50 to $500 dollars.

While a specific name for the challenge hasn't been found, videos of people poking fun at the activity of stealing the signs are readily available on the app and no videos actually identify a person committing the act of stealing campaign material from someone else's property. Some posts contain videos showing the signs they have stolen and include captions that threaten to steal the neighbor's signs again if they replace them. Others state that the contents of posts are in jest or 'just a metaphor'.

Did you hear that the WannaCry cyber attack all came from North Korea?

Last week the U.S. Government officially put the blame on North Korea for the WannaCry cyber attack, the one that used ransomware techniques across the globe and reportedly disrupted more than 200K businesses from over 35 countries in May of 2017.

This was a great win for the United States, with counterterrorism experts in the U.S. government, primarily Homeland Security, putting the ownership of this horrendous globally perpetuated attack squarely into North Korea. Multiple sources across the globe have confirmed with their own findings the same results, and all fingers now point at North Korea.
The attack was so devastating that it crippled many sectors of the global economy, including the UK's National Health Service. Reports from the UK noted that the attack worked to encrypt and render useless many hundreds of thousands of hospital-based computers but also those in schools, businesses and also homes. During this attack, victims received demands for ransom payments, but as it turned out these payments did not unlock their computers. The WannaCry attack was widespread across the globe and and cost billions of dollars in lost revenues and incomes.

Fake News Sites Banned from Buying Ads on Facebook

Fake news sites have grown in number due to the the rapid pace of advances in technology and the increase in social media sites allowing instant updates on breaking news and trending stories. Everyday, we are swamped with news stories whenever use a smart phone or log onto Facebook or email. It is also easy to pass these news stories on to other people by simply clicking on the share button. With a single click, a fake news site story can be sent to thousands of people around the world. The 2016 U.S. election shows us just how fast a fake news site story can reach millions.

Patent trolls were dealt a hard blow recently with a US court ruling that a company can only be sued for unlawful infringement on patent rights in the country where the business resides and is incorporated. For thirty odd years, patent trolls have been making a killing by trolling after enterprises that they deem guilty of the patent infringement sin. They're a special breed of entrepreneurs cum opportunists who thrive on suing alleged errant companies in order to earn hefty rewards.

For patent trolls, the days are gone when they can run after the big fish in the pond. The new challenge that the court just added meant chasing perceived Dirty Harries in their bailiwicks where they have full access to an unlimited legal arsenal. Unless the new law were repealed, patent trolls could soon become a dying breed.